🎉 Celebrating 25 Years of GameDev.net! 🎉

Not many can claim 25 years on the Internet! Join us in celebrating this milestone. Learn more about our history, and thank you for being a part of our community!

Back to Math and Physics

Projectile Motion not behaving as expected

DrDeath3191 · 2019-06-25T16:33:27

Hello, So I've been looking into the kinematic equations for the purposes of projectile motion. I specifically needed to hit a specific point at a specific time, so I am using the formula listed under "lateral speed" on this page. I am solving for the initial velocity and acceleration values. My game uses a fixed timestep of 60 ticks per second, and I am integrating my physics using semi-implicit Euler. By all accounts this should work fine on its own, yet it does not. If I were to plug in the found values into the kinematic equation x = x0 + vt + 1/2at^2 (I apologize for not using LaTeX; it doesn't show a preview when writing this comment), it would land precisely where I want it to. However, if I evaluate it per frame, I get significantly off. Here's the code for how I launched the projectile, including the code I was using to test where it would be during its flight time: float t = 15.0f; // t is in frames float targetHeight = -250.0f; float yAcceleration = 0.0f; glm::vec3 diff = targetPosition - initialPosition; glm::vec3 airDisplacement = glm::dot(diff, WORLD_UP) * WORLD_UP; glm::vec3 groundDisplacement = diff - airDisplacement; glm::vec3 xVel = groundDisplacement / t; //got the following from https://www.forrestthewoods.com/blog/solving_ballistic_trajectories/, //with slight adjustment to account for a negated y coordinate float a = glm::dot(initialPosition, WORLD_UP); float b = a + targetHeight; float c = glm::dot(targetPosition, WORLD_UP); yAcceleration = -4 * (a - (2 * b) + c) / (t * t); float yVal = ((3 * a) - (4 * b) + c) / (t); glm::vec3 yVel = WORLD_UP * yVal; glm::vec3 newVelocity = xVel + yVel; glm::vec3 accelerationVector = WORLD_UP * yAcceleration; //Testing code to see what the position should be at each frame //The first loop is how it would look according the equation of motion, //the second is pretty much how it would work in-game glm::vec3 priorPrediction = initialPosition; float testEnd = t; for (float testT = 1.0f; testT <= testEnd; testT++) { glm::vec3 predictedPosition = initialPosition + (newVelocity * testT) + (0.5f * accelerationVector) * (testT * testT); glm::vec3 predictionDiff = predictedPosition - priorPrediction; printf("Predicted Position in %f frames: (%f, %f, %f)\n", testT, predictedPosition.x, predictedPosition.y, predictedPosition.z); priorPrediction = predictedPosition; } priorPrediction = initialPosition; glm::vec3 v = newVelocity; for (float testT = 1.0f; testT <= testEnd; testT++) { v += accelerationVector; glm::vec3 predictedPosition = priorPrediction + v; glm::vec3 predictionDiff = predictedPosition - priorPrediction; printf("Predicted (Step) Position in %f frames: (%f, %f, %f)\n", testT, predictedPosition.x, predictedPosition.y, predictedPosition.z); priorPrediction = predictedPosition; } When the step integrated solution was evaluated, the ground position was always where it was supposed to be (barring some floating point error, not even all that noticeable). The position in the air, however seemed as though it was too low; specifically as though it was arriving one frame prior to when it should arrive. So, I edited the calculation of yVal above as follows: float offsetT = t + 1; yAcceleration = -4 * (a - (2 * b) + c) / (offsetT * offsetT); float yVal = ((3 * a) - (4 * b) + c) / (offsetT); And what do you know, now it works exactly how I want. It arrives at the target position in exactly 15 frames as I intended. I should be happy with this, but I am hesitant to accept a solution if I don't understand why it works, especially since it actually doesn't line up in the kinematic equation. So that's my question; why is it that the y velocity calculation seems to be one frame too fast in this implementation?

Math and Physics Programming

Started by DrDeath3191 June 20, 2019 07:32 PM

10 comments, last by Alberth 5 years ago

Alberth

10,216

June 25, 2019 04:33 PM

I think the only way to get a handle on the problem is to go down to individual integration steps, compare against theoretical results, and find the origin of the discrepancies.

🎉 Celebrating 25 Years of GameDev.net! 🎉

Projectile Motion not behaving as expected

This topic is closed to new replies.

Popular Topics

Recommended Tutorials

🎉 Celebrating 25 Years of GameDev.net! 🎉

Projectile Motion not behaving as expected

This topic is closed to new replies.

Popular Topics

Recommended Tutorials

Reticulating splines